2001
DOI: 10.1054/iccn.2001.1590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No going back: narratives by close relatives of the braindead patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The narratives of our study confirm the necessity that health-care providers, when dealing with family members of a deceased brain-dead patient, be fully present, listen carefully and allow time for dialogue (34,35). Requesting organ donation is a difficult task and must be handled sensitively and with compassion, so as not to bring any further harm to relatives by the urgency of the request.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The narratives of our study confirm the necessity that health-care providers, when dealing with family members of a deceased brain-dead patient, be fully present, listen carefully and allow time for dialogue (34,35). Requesting organ donation is a difficult task and must be handled sensitively and with compassion, so as not to bring any further harm to relatives by the urgency of the request.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Families are especially susceptible when a nonsurvivable neurological injury or illness occurs suddenly in their loved one. [8] This is often associated with emotional exhaustion, which can be further compounded when the question of organ donation comes up. [9] Throughout the patient's stay, pastoral care is present to provide supportive care to families of critically ill patients, addressing their physical, emotional and spiritual needs, and preparing them for next steps should organ donation become a possibility.…”
Section: The Health-care Team's Focus On Family Care and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main study from which the secondary analysis presented here was conducted was based on the interpretation theory of Ricoeur (1976, 1991), and phenomenological hermeneutics was chosen for the project (Frid et al. 2001).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of imagery (including metaphors) may enable the narrator to review, refine and reformulate interpretation of the story (Ricoeur 1988). We therefore performed a secondary analysis of data from a study into the experience of confronting the BD of a family member (Frid et al. 2001) to explore in depth the imagery used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%