2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4484-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No harm, no benefit: should we give up with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Thille's study [20], 10% or more was marked as a cutoff point because it was associated with worse clinical outcomes. This reference parameter was adopted in the other studies on patient-ventilator asynchrony [40,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50].The fact that the highest incidence of total AI of 10% or higher occurs in VCV ventilation may be related to the characteristic of the mode that promotes constant volume delivery, in contrast to the physiological process, in which the inspired volume varies with every breath. Many asynchronies probably occurred when the volume delivered was not adequate for the need in certain cycles, whereas in PCV these moments were less frequent because the volume varies accordingly to the respiratory mechanics [45,46].…”
Section: Asynchrony Index -Severity Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Thille's study [20], 10% or more was marked as a cutoff point because it was associated with worse clinical outcomes. This reference parameter was adopted in the other studies on patient-ventilator asynchrony [40,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50].The fact that the highest incidence of total AI of 10% or higher occurs in VCV ventilation may be related to the characteristic of the mode that promotes constant volume delivery, in contrast to the physiological process, in which the inspired volume varies with every breath. Many asynchronies probably occurred when the volume delivered was not adequate for the need in certain cycles, whereas in PCV these moments were less frequent because the volume varies accordingly to the respiratory mechanics [45,46].…”
Section: Asynchrony Index -Severity Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients submitted to low parameters may not have their metabolic needs attended to during this phase of assessing their readiness for extubation [47]. With underassistance of ventilation, patients are forced to increase their respiratory work and lung volumes, consequently they present a greater magnitude of asynchrony, among them double triggering and associated stacking [48].…”
Section: Asynchrony Index -Severity Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%