2018
DOI: 10.1177/2165079918811318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Laughing Matter: Workplace Bullying, Humor Orientation, and Leadership Styles

Abstract: Workplace bullying is associated with a host of negative outcomes for the worker who is the target of bullying, as well as for the organization where the bullying occurs. Moreover, we know that rates of bullying are particularly high in health care settings; however, we are less familiar with the factors that may reduce workplace bullying in hospitals. Thus, this study was conducted to determine whether the humor orientation styles of individuals, including nurses working in hospitals, as well as their manager… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elevated work engagement, satisfaction, performance and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors ( Decker, 1987 ; Goswami et al, 2016 ; de Souza et al, 2019 ; Guenzi et al, 2019 ; Mills et al, 2019 ; Neves and Karagonlar, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elevated work engagement, satisfaction, performance and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors ( Decker, 1987 ; Goswami et al, 2016 ; de Souza et al, 2019 ; Guenzi et al, 2019 ; Mills et al, 2019 ; Neves and Karagonlar, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Improved employee psychological capital and wellbeing (Kim et al, 2016;Wijewardena et al, 2017). • Elevated work engagement, satisfaction, performance and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (Decker, 1987;Goswami et al, 2016;de Souza et al, 2019;Guenzi et al, 2019;Mills et al, 2019;Neves and Karagonlar, 2020). • Enhanced ability to manage organizational change (Vetter and Gockel, 2016).…”
Section: Humor Styles and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many leadership styles have been discovered and studied, such as pragmatic, servant, authentic, ethical and spiritual styles (Anderson and Sun, 2017); empowering, paradoxical and servant styles (Huertas-Valdivia et al, 2019); and paternalistic, democratic and authentic leadership styles (Ahmed et al, 2018). Although these styles were evident in our study, we discovered that the majority of the studies used the most popular leadership styles of transformational, transactional and passive avoidant (Berkovich, 2018;Cheung et al, 2017;Kumar and Sharma, 2018;Mills et al, 2018;Nazarian et al, 2017;Ricard et al, 2017;Soliman, 2018;Yang, 2015;Zhang et al, 2018). Overall, although many leadership styles other than transformational, transactional and passive avoidant have been used, these are not pervasive.…”
Section: Leadership Styles Measurementmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Leadership styles can have a positive impact on the development and use of organizational learning and commitment (Ebrahim and Yahaya, 2016), job and meeting JMD 40,1 satisfaction (Abdelhafiz et al, 2016), organization subordinates' performance (Kwanya and Stilwell, 2018;Nazarian et al, 2017;Sethibe, 2017), followers' innovative behaviour (Ahmed et al, 2018;Gong et al, 2018;Hansen and Pihl-Thingvad, 2019), work engagement and commitment (Ribeiro et al, 2018), risk-taking, decision-making participation and empowerment (Huertas-Valdivia et al, 2019), career readiness (Villarreal et al, 2018), positive working environment (Mills et al, 2018), total quality management practices (Kumar and Sharma, 2018;Soliman, 2018) and building followers' trust (Yasir et al, 2016).…”
Section: Leadership Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…work, diminish bullying and burnout, and foster work engagement (14,15,(17)(18)(19)(20). Conversely, a transactional leadership style (TrLS) is task-oriented and aims to ful ll objectives, ensure standards and monitor outcomes (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%