No more fairytales: a quest for alternative narratives of sustainable business

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore storytelling in sustainability reporting. The author posits that large PLCs use their sustainability reports to support the construction of a fairytale of “sustainable business”, and asks if organisations with an alternative purpose (social enterprises, values-based SMEs) and/or ownership structure (co-operatives, partnerships) can offer a counter-narrative of the sustainability–business relationship. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses the literature on storytelling and organisational mythmaking to gain insight into the construction of narratives and their impact on the reader. A narrative analysis is conducted of the sustainability reports of 40 organisations across a range of entity classes, including large PLCs, values-based SMEs, co-owned businesses and social enterprises. Findings The analysis indicates that the narratives presented in sustainability reporting are of much the same form across entity classes. The author argues on this basis that sustainability reports represent stories targeted at specific stakeholders rather than accounts of the organisation’s relationship with ecological and societal sustainability, and urges scholars to challenge organisations across entity classes to engage with sustainability at a planetary level. Originality/value The paper seeks to contribute to the literature in two ways. First, the author illustrates how the literature on storytelling can be used to analyse organisational narratives of sustainability, and how narrative forms and genres can be mobilised to support potential counter-narratives. Second, the author explores and ultimately challenges the proposition that organisations less often examined in the literature, such as social enterprises and co-operatives, can offer alternative narratives of the sustainability–business relationship.

The Challenge of Sustainable Development Goal Reporting: The First Evidence from Italian Listed Companies

“…Interestingly enough, these findings are in line with recent studies on sustainable development reporting narrative [85] and institutionalization of sustainability reporting within organization. In exploring how sustainability reporting managers institutionalize sustainability reporting within organizations, Farooq and de Villier [86] affirm that organizations require time in order to achieve a higher level of maturity and a deeper embedding and routinization of sustainability reporting, identifying ten reasons why material issues are not always (adequately) disclosed.…”

Learning from the Best: New Challenges and Trends in IR Reporters’ Disclosure and the Role of SDGs

“…As occurs with any hot topic in the academic and professional debate, IR is not exempt from criticism. A widespread skepticism is growing about IR's ability to effectively contribute to corporate sustainability [43] and move beyond communication [44], leading some researchers to brand IR a failure [23]. Aware of that, the IIRC is currently refreshing the IR Framework to ensure integrated reporting continues to meet the wider goals of financial stability and sustainable development.…”

Corporate Social Responsibility due diligence among European companies: The results of an interventionist research project with accountability and political implications

“…However, in the past, companies used to adopt corporate soft law about socially responsible behaviours as an instrument to increase their reputation rather than as an effective tool for transparency (Bebbington et al, 2012; Garcia‐Torea et al, 2019). In fact, prior studies highlighted that the adoption of social responsible practices by organisations could be negatively influenced by unethical mechanisms such as blue washing, greenwashing or impression management (Berliner & Prakash, 2015; Di Tullio et al, 2019; O'Dochartaigh, 2019; Pizzi et al, 2020). Furthermore, other studies have demonstrated that companies recurs to a tick‐box approach when it comes to implement CSR due diligence (Abdo et al, 2018; Ackers & Eccles, 2015).…”