No news is bad news

Lavoie, Curtis F.

doi:10.1017/s1481803500011866

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Emergency medicine (EM) physicians, hospitalists, and other clinicians sometimes continue to monitor the progress of their patients after those patients have been admitted, discharged, or signed out to another colleague. [1][2][3][4][5][6] They track patients through a variety of means, including reviewing the electronic health record (EHR), communicating with the patient's new care team, or communicating with the patient. 2,7 Patient tracking has been encouraged by EM residency programs and was a residency requirement from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electronic health record–based patient tracking by emergency medicine physicians

Burke

Gurley

Dhaliwal

et al. 2022

AEM Education and Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Emergency medicine (EM) physicians commonly track the progress of former patients to learn about their clinical outcome. While some studies have described the behavior, little is known about the specific information sought during tracking.The objective of this study was to determine how often EM physicians track patients and the motivations, strategies, and barriers to tracking. Methods:In June 2019 we surveyed EM physicians practicing at six hospitals. We defined patient tracking as viewing the chart of a patient who was no longer under the physician's care or contacting the patient or the patient's subsequent providers to learn about the patient's progress. The survey asked respondents how often they track patients, by what mechanisms, and for what reasons. The survey also asked what information physicians sought when tracking and what barriers to tracking exist.Results: Of the 156 EM physicians invited to respond, 111 completed the survey (72% response rate). Of those, 109 (98%) reported tracking their patients, and residents reported tracking a higher percentage of patients than attendings. Reasons for tracking included an unusual or complex case (98%), uncertain diagnosis (89%), and concern about a potential error (48%). Most respondents (86%) said that knowledge gained from patient tracking changed their subsequent practice patterns, and almost all respondents (98%) strongly agreed or agreed that tracking helps physicians avoid future mistakes. The most commonly sought information types during tracking were the hospital discharge summary or emergency department note from the index visit, test results since the index visit, and new diagnoses added since the index visit. Physicians cited time limitations and difficulty accessing information as the leading barriers to tracking.Conclusions: Patient tracking is nearly ubiquitous among surveyed EM physicians, who find it valuable for learning and patient safety.

show abstract