2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No oxygen isotope exchange between water and APS–sulfate at surface temperature: Evidence from quantum chemical modeling and triple-oxygen isotope experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…100 µL of 13 mM formaldehyde was added, which effectively suppresses the oxidation of sulfite during the subsequent anion-exchange chromatographic step (Lindgren and Cedergren, 1982;Keller-Lehmann et al, 2006). APS is known to hydrolyze rapidly under acidic conditions (Kohl et al, 2012) but rather stable around neutral pH. Based on our tests, without an aid of enzymes, APS was not decomposed in 2 hours at 32°C within the precision of measurement (5%).…”
Section: Intracellular Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…100 µL of 13 mM formaldehyde was added, which effectively suppresses the oxidation of sulfite during the subsequent anion-exchange chromatographic step (Lindgren and Cedergren, 1982;Keller-Lehmann et al, 2006). APS is known to hydrolyze rapidly under acidic conditions (Kohl et al, 2012) but rather stable around neutral pH. Based on our tests, without an aid of enzymes, APS was not decomposed in 2 hours at 32°C within the precision of measurement (5%).…”
Section: Intracellular Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Previously, a negligible equilibrium isotope effect has been presumed between sulfate and APS because of their identical oxidation states (Rees, 1973;Brunner and Bernasconi, 2005). Also, since no sulfur-oxygen bonds are broken during APS formation, a large primary kinetic isotope effect is unlikely (Kohl et al, 2012;Parey et al, 2013). At this point, we cannot specify the mechanism of sulfur isotope fractionation between APS and intracellular sulfate, but possible explanations may include secondary isotope effects due to loosening of the S-O bonds in the transition state, or fractionation associated with the metabolic branch-point between dissimilatory and assimilatory APS reduction.…”
Section: Metabolic Response To Lactate Depletionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…fractionation observed during DSR results from reversible enzymatic steps during sulfate reduction, enabling the oxidation of sulfoxy intermediates that rapidly exchange oxygen isotopes with ambient water back to sulfate. Sulfite is considered to be an important intermediate in DSR and is known to rapidly exchange oxygen isotopes with water, unlike the more oxidized sulfoxy anions in DSR, such as APS or cell-internal sulfate (Brunner et al, 2012;Kohl et al, 2012). The value of 15.2& obtained for e EQ SO 2À 3 $H 2 O is much smaller than the estimates for DSR-mediated isotope equilibrium between sulfate and water.…”
Section: Implications Of the Obtained Oxygen Isotope Equilibrium Fracmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Whereas δ 34 S SO4 yields interesting insight on the overall throughput of sulfur through microbial communities, the δ 18 O SO4 better illuminates the internal cell dynamics of sulfur cycling (Mizutani and Rafter 1973;Fritz et al 1989;Brunner et al 2005Brunner et al , 2012Mangalo et al 2007Mangalo et al , 2008Wortmann et al 2007;Antler et al 2013). Oxygen atoms in sulfate molecules equilibrate intracellularly when sulfur is in the intermediate valence state of sulfite (Kohl et al, 2012;Wortmann et al 2007;Brunner et al 2012;Kohl et al 2012). δ 18 O SO4 is useful for tracking the sulfur atom as it transitions among its various valence states during the subsurface sulfur cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%