2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1945666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Pass No Drive: Education and Allocation of Time

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dismissal policies we leverage generate large discontinuities in academic outcomes, in line with the previous literature, which has examined similar institutional discontinuities (Lindo et al, 2010;Vidal-Fernandez, 2011;Barua and Vidal-Fernandez, 2014). Students just below the cutoff are approximately 16 percentage points less likely to enroll in the following term, complete 0.2 fewer years of school and are 10 percentage points less likely to obtain a BA relative to those above the threshold.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The dismissal policies we leverage generate large discontinuities in academic outcomes, in line with the previous literature, which has examined similar institutional discontinuities (Lindo et al, 2010;Vidal-Fernandez, 2011;Barua and Vidal-Fernandez, 2014). Students just below the cutoff are approximately 16 percentage points less likely to enroll in the following term, complete 0.2 fewer years of school and are 10 percentage points less likely to obtain a BA relative to those above the threshold.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%