2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13225-013-0273-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No plant functional diversity effects on foliar fungal pathogens in experimental tree communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a plot‐based evaluation (such as that employed in the BIOTREE experiment by Hantsch et al . ) was not possible, as we only focused on two target species, which did not occur in all plots. The outermost row in all plots was not sampled to ensure that all target trees could potentially have six trees in their local plant neighbourhood.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a plot‐based evaluation (such as that employed in the BIOTREE experiment by Hantsch et al . ) was not possible, as we only focused on two target species, which did not occur in all plots. The outermost row in all plots was not sampled to ensure that all target trees could potentially have six trees in their local plant neighbourhood.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As plant parasites, fungi can cause significant economic loss with far-reaching social implications and consequences in agriculture, forestry and natural ecosystems (Fisher et al 2012). They are also part of the natural ecosystem and play an important role in regulation of species (Hantsch et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher biodiversity may decrease the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases, thus providing a “dilution effect” as an important ecosystem service, or it may instead amplify the emergence and spread of diseases (Civitello et al., ; Johnson, Ostfeld, & Keesing, ; Keesing, Holt, & Ostfeld, ; Ostfeld & Keesing, ). Field studies in both natural and artificial ecosystems (mainly random species loss experiments; e.g., Hantsch, Braun, Scherer‐Lorenzen, & Bruelheide, ; Hantsch et al., ; Knops et al., ; Liu, Lyu, Zhou, & Bradshaw, ; Mitchell, Tilman, & Groth, ; Rottstock, Joshi, Kummer, & Fischer, ), and also meta‐analysis (Civitello et al., ), have overwhelmingly documented dilution rather than amplification effects; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Furthermore, although the randomized species losses in these experiments isolated the effect of species number per se on disease prevalence, avoiding confounding effects of species identity (Huston, ), randomized species lose almost does not occur in natural conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%