“…Higher biodiversity may decrease the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases, thus providing a “dilution effect” as an important ecosystem service, or it may instead amplify the emergence and spread of diseases (Civitello et al., ; Johnson, Ostfeld, & Keesing, ; Keesing, Holt, & Ostfeld, ; Ostfeld & Keesing, ). Field studies in both natural and artificial ecosystems (mainly random species loss experiments; e.g., Hantsch, Braun, Scherer‐Lorenzen, & Bruelheide, ; Hantsch et al., ; Knops et al., ; Liu, Lyu, Zhou, & Bradshaw, ; Mitchell, Tilman, & Groth, ; Rottstock, Joshi, Kummer, & Fischer, ), and also meta‐analysis (Civitello et al., ), have overwhelmingly documented dilution rather than amplification effects; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Furthermore, although the randomized species losses in these experiments isolated the effect of species number per se on disease prevalence, avoiding confounding effects of species identity (Huston, ), randomized species lose almost does not occur in natural conditions.…”