2018
DOI: 10.1364/ao.57.003915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-reference stereoscopic image quality assessment based on hue summation–difference mapping image and binocular joint mutual filtering

Abstract: The no-reference (NR) quality assessment for stereoscopic images plays a significant role in 3D technology, but it also faces great challenges. In this paper, a novel NR stereo image quality assessment (SIQA) method is proposed. Based on the human visual system, this method mimics the summation and difference channels, which consider the binocular interactive perception property, to process the visual information. Especially, the summation and difference images are calculated by the contrast of hue and luminan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four quality factor pairs are set for compressing each view of HSOI with the JPEG XT, and the corresponding distortion level is represented by L1, L2, L3 and L4, respectively, from high to low. The four quality factor pairs (q, Q) are set to (16,9), (30,19), (50,30) and (90, 72), which correspond to L1, L2, L3 and L4, respectively. Considering the stereoscopic perception of HSOI, the left view or right view is, respectively, compressed with one of the four quality factor pairs to produce nine distortion levels, including four symmetric encoding distortion levels and five asymmetric encoding distortion as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four quality factor pairs are set for compressing each view of HSOI with the JPEG XT, and the corresponding distortion level is represented by L1, L2, L3 and L4, respectively, from high to low. The four quality factor pairs (q, Q) are set to (16,9), (30,19), (50,30) and (90, 72), which correspond to L1, L2, L3 and L4, respectively. Considering the stereoscopic perception of HSOI, the left view or right view is, respectively, compressed with one of the four quality factor pairs to produce nine distortion levels, including four symmetric encoding distortion levels and five asymmetric encoding distortion as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Joint image filtering Previous studies [50] showed that the content difference between the left and right views of a stereoscopic image was due to the existence of parallax, but the final result of human binocular perception undergoing three fluctuations is to form a stable stereoscopic image. Therefore, it can be inferred that there is an interactive filtering effect between the left and right views.…”
Section: Binocular Perception Module (Bpm) For Distorted Hsoimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we obtain the gradient-related information of the cyclopean signal to get the binocular features. The difference signal is given by subtracting the right image from the left image, which has been proved that the difference information can well explain disparity perception in SIQA area [15], [57]. Works [58], [69] revealed that the difference signal is sensitive to the disparity and carries information critical for stereo perception.…”
Section: ) Binocular Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the proposed model with three 2D IQA models (SSIM, BRISQUE [62] and ADD-GSIM [72]) and eleven 3D metrics: Shao2016 [16], Shao2017 [73], Zhou2017 [10], Zhou'2017 [12], Liu2018 [74], Wang2018 [75], Ma2018 [20], Yue2018 [40] Shao2018 [17], Chen2019 [21], and Liu2019 [18], on LIVE 3D Phase I and LIVE 3D Phase II. Works conducted on MCL 3D Database are relatively fewer, so here we take eight works compared with our proposed model on MCL 3D Database: SSIM, BRISQUE, Shao2016, Zhou2017, Liu2018 [74], Yang'2018 [15], Chen2019 and Liu2019. The comparison results are listed in Table 2 and Table 3, and the top two performances are highlighted in boldface.…”
Section: B Overall Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation