2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2021.102058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-reference stereoscopic image quality assessment using quaternion wavelet transform and heterogeneous ensemble learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were mapped onto perceptual quality scores with a trained support vector regressor (SVR). NSS-based methods have been proposed in other transform domains, i.e., curvelet [11], contourlet [12], quaternion wavelet transform [13] and discrete cosine transform [14] and in the spatial domain [15], as well.…”
Section: Nss-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were mapped onto perceptual quality scores with a trained support vector regressor (SVR). NSS-based methods have been proposed in other transform domains, i.e., curvelet [11], contourlet [12], quaternion wavelet transform [13] and discrete cosine transform [14] and in the spatial domain [15], as well.…”
Section: Nss-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grigoryan and Agaian [103] proposed an image restoration model with the Wiener filter and quaternion Fourier transform, which can handle denoising and deblurring tasks. Wang et al [104] applied the QWT for a no-reference stereoscopic image quality assessment. Other transforms, such as the quaternion polar harmonic transform [105] and discrete wavelet transform [106], were also extended to the quaternion domain with better performance.…”
Section: Transformation-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diminution is similar for both datasets. Metrics Waterloo-P1/Waterloo-P2 Waterloo-P2/Waterloo-P1 Liu [12] 0.696 0.701 Yang [14] 0.781 0.864 Chen [22] 0.806 0.846 Saliency-SIQA [17] 0.826 0.848 DECOSINE [13] 0.842 0.873 Wang [15] 0.856 0.881 Proposed 0.944 0.940 0.9. Compared to the second best metric (i.e., Wang), the improvement accuracy of quality assessment was found to be 10% in terms of PLCC.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, series of feature extraction have been conducted from these images. Recently in [15], monocular and binocular quality features, including texture and energy features, are first retrieved, and then ensemble learning is utilized to map the quality score. Meanwhile, in [16] a multi-task CNN model is proposed to extract NSS features as an auxiliary task, and to produce quality score as primary task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%