1988
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.2.462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No reflow and extent of infarction during maximal vasodilation in the porcine heart.

Abstract: To explore the relation between myocardial and vascular injury in the generation of the no-reflow phenomenon, the pressure-flow relation during maximal vasodilation after coronary artery reperfusion was studied in the open-chest porcine model. During both endogenous and maximal vasodilation with intracoronary adenosine, pressure-flow (P/Q) plots were constructed before and after 20-minute (n = 9) or 40-minute (n = 17) circumflex artery occlusions. Decreases in circumflex vascular bed conductance were represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a previous study used FPCE and LGE MRI at the mid-ventricular slices, and the authors found a linear relationship between myocardial perfusion and residual viable myocardium in the infarct zone (6). This linear relationship is consistent with the findings obtained from animal models, in which the relationship is valid over the whole LV (25). Given that the perfusion-viability relationship is universally valid, we believe that the linear relationship between the exercise-induced perfusion change and the amount of residual viable myocardium in the infract zone should be equally applicable to other levels of the LV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, a previous study used FPCE and LGE MRI at the mid-ventricular slices, and the authors found a linear relationship between myocardial perfusion and residual viable myocardium in the infarct zone (6). This linear relationship is consistent with the findings obtained from animal models, in which the relationship is valid over the whole LV (25). Given that the perfusion-viability relationship is universally valid, we believe that the linear relationship between the exercise-induced perfusion change and the amount of residual viable myocardium in the infract zone should be equally applicable to other levels of the LV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that infarct-related artery patency and myocardial perfusion are not necessarily concordant in humans (26,27). Even with epicardial coronary reflow, myocardial perfusion may not be achieved (the lowreflow or no-reflow phenomenon) because of microvascular disruption, plugging by debris or myocardial edema (14,28). Thus, the ability to identify the presence or absence of myocardial perfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography during the post-acute myocardial infarct period may offer important advantages over simple assessment of infarct-related artery patency during catheterization, and predicts left ventricular function and further remodeling (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain these observations including mechanical obstruction from capillary damage (1), neutrophil plugging (2) and tissue edema (3) or increased resistance due to enhanced vasomotor tone (4) or ischemic contracture (5). Johnson et al (20) attempted to dissociate maximal vasodilator capacity from the presence of necrosis in a swine model of ischemia and reperfusion. Using the coronary pressure-flow relationship during constant adenosine infusion, they showed that the vasodilator response is unchanged after 20 min of ischemia and reperfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%