2020
DOI: 10.1214/20-ecp362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No repulsion between critical points for planar Gaussian random fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• In the particular case of the random plane wave (N = 2), our result coincides with the result of [11], formula (4) and [12], Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Remarkssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• In the particular case of the random plane wave (N = 2), our result coincides with the result of [11], formula (4) and [12], Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Remarkssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the particular case of the random plane wave (N = 2), the bound (44) is weaker than [11], formula (8), while (45) is sharper than [11], formula (5) or [12], Theorem 1.5.…”
Section: Correlation Function Between Critical Points With a Given Indexmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the isotropic case, one may also entertain an intermediate notion of zero attraction or repulsion, in the situation when K 2 (0) > 0 is a finite, strictly positive number. For example, one may compare [9,10] this value at the origin of the 2-point correlation function corresponding to the critical points of F to that of the Poisson point process of the same intensity. Analogously to the above, one may introduce the k-point correlation function, k ≥ 3, to relate to the higher moments of the nodal volume.…”
Section: Main Ideas: Kac-rice Formulae and Their Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 4.17. For s > 5 2 , there exists an explicit constant κ(s) > 0 such that Note that all the nonzero matrix components are exactly of order 1/r. While this fact does not make the problem any harder from a conceptual point of view, it leads to cumbersome expressions for the various quantities appearing in the equations.…”
Section: Note Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic analysis of N (∇u, R) hinges on the celebrated Kac-Rice counting formula, which, under suitable technical hypotheses, expresses the expected number of zeros of a random field (in this case, the gradient ∇u) has in terms of a multivariate integral. As is well known, this formula has been used profusely in the literature [11,17,4,5], and in particular lies at the heart of the computation of EN (∇u, R) for s = 0 and of the finer asymptotics bounds for the expected number of extrema and saddle points and for higher order correlations obtained in [4] also in the translation-invariant case s = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%