Constructivism and the Rage Against Expertise W HEN DISCO was king, protest bumper stickers began to appear that proclaimed, "Disco stinks! We want to see the band." Many disco bands at the time actually consisted of a couple of guys with access to synthesizers and drum machines that could keep a beat. These bands never went on tour for the simple reason that there was no real band behind the machinery. Similarly, students today want to see the teacher, although in many cases the teacher has been banished to the scrap heap by the currently popular educational theory known as constructivism. Textbooks tell us that constructivism is student-centered and is on the opposite side of the continuum from subject-centered or teacher-centered instruction. 1 According to constructivist thinking, "knowledge is personal, and arises out of experiences and interactions which are unique to each individual." The teacher's role is to "facilitate personal learning by establishing a community of learners, and by making it clear to the student that he or she is part of that community." 2 In truth, many aspects of constructivism are commendable. Few could quarrel with the desire for students in a class to feel that they belong to a "community of learners." The drive to engage students actively in their learning is timely. But somewhere, somehow, the constructivist paradigm has become as inflexible as the instructional approach its proponents are eager LAWRENCE A.