2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.63.035005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-scale scenario with nonuniversal gaugino masses

Abstract: Phenomenological issues of no-scale structure of Kähler potential are reexamined, which arises in various approaches to supersymmetry breaking.When no-scale boundary conditions are given at the Grand Unified scale and universal gaugino masses are postulated, a bino mass is quite degenerate with right-handed slepton masses and the requirement that the lightest superparticle (LSP) be neutral supplemented with slepton searches at LEP200 severely constrains allowed mass regions of superparticles. The situation dra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If gaugino masses are universal at M c = M GUT , it is rather difficult that the LSP is a neutral particle [48,49]. One can avoid this difficulty either by assuming M c > M GUT or non-universal gaugino masses [48,49].…”
Section: No-scale or Gaugino Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If gaugino masses are universal at M c = M GUT , it is rather difficult that the LSP is a neutral particle [48,49]. One can avoid this difficulty either by assuming M c > M GUT or non-universal gaugino masses [48,49].…”
Section: No-scale or Gaugino Mediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. (3.6) is zero at M G if we impose the noscale boundary condition, but it is nonzero (and negative for particles with 6 Here, we consider the case where the SO(10) gauge group breaks down into the gauge groups SU(3)C×SU(2)L ×U(1)Y ×U(1)5 in a single step at the scale MG.…”
Section: Su(5)×u(1) 5 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was shown recently that the minimal noscale model with M X = M G is actually not consistent with phenomenological bounds [5,6,7], mainly due to the lower bound on the Higgs boson mass and the cosmological requirement that a charged particle (in particular stau) is not the lightest SUSY particle (LSP). There might be several ways to reconcile the noscale boundary condition with these phenomenological bounds, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expressing m 2 H 2 at the right hand side in terms of the GUT scale mass parameters at a representative value of tan β = 10 gives [14,15] …”
Section: Non-universal Gaugino Mass Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%