No second chances: demography from the forest floor to the canopy and back again

Abstract

Summary Secondary hemiepiphytes have one of the most bizarre life histories among vascular plants. They germinate on the forest floor, climb onto a host tree, gradually grow up and start producing seeds if the host tree is taller than the minimum height required for reproductive onset. Because most of the host trees in the forest are too small to allow reproduction, most seedlings of secondary hemiepiphytes of the genus Heteropsis climb onto unsuitable hosts. This problem may be remediated by moving from unsuitable to suitable hosts by vegetative propagation, providing a second chance to contribute to recruitment. Still, such a strategy comes at a demographic risk of increased mortality and may thus contribute little to population growth. Here we ask what are the relative contributions of Heteropsis individuals on suitable vs. unsuitable hosts to their population growth rates (λ). We studied the demography of three species of the genus Heteropsis in the Colombian Amazon, distinguishing subpopulations on suitable and unsuitable hosts. We constructed multistate matrix population models and performed elasticity and loop analyses. For all three Heteropsis species, λ ≥ 1, indicating that studied populations are viable. Vital rates and loop elasticities showed that individuals on suitable hosts contributed 85–98% and 80–96%, respectively. Consequently, individuals that climb directly to suitable hosts predominantly drive the population dynamics of the three studied Heteropsis species and second chances (vegetative reproduction) do not matter for demographic viability. Our results are evidence of a strong source–sink dynamic for the studied species, whereby individuals on unsuitable hosts act as sink subpopulations and individuals on suitable hosts as source subpopulations. The population growth rates of the examined Heteropsis species were strongly limited by recruitment of individuals on suitable hosts and the high proportion of seedlings climbing onto unsuitable hosts, which are demographic ‘lost cases’. Synthesis. Our study illustrates a strong environmental filtering and multiple bottlenecks in the life cycle of secondary hemiepiphytes. Our findings contribute with an understudied plant life‐history strategy to the extensive repertoire of better‐known ecological plant strategies such as tree gap dynamics, clonal reproduction and permanent seedbanks.

Tree species vary widely in their tolerance for liana infestation: A case study of differential host response to generalist parasites

“…Furthermore, lianas are dependent on their hosts for success (see e.g. Balcázar‐Vargas, Salguero‐Gómez, & Zuidema, ), and variation in liana prevalence may feedback on the relative success of different liana strategies varying in virulence (Ichihashi & Tateno, ). Hence, there exists a complex interplay where lianas affect their hosts who in turn affect the lianas (Figure ).…”

Short-term spatial variation in the demography of a common Neotropical liana is shaped by tree community structure and light availability

“…Liana populations are commonly reported to have λ ≥ 1 (Escalante et al 2004;Nabe-Nielsen 2004;Kouassi et al 2008;Balcázar-Vargas et al 2015), but this was not the case for M. difficilis. One likely explanation for this difference is that the previous studies of liana population dynamics were conducted in late successional forests, where new gaps with suitable host trees appeared approximately as fast as the suitable hosts disappeared in the remainder of the forest.…”