2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No significant influence of pre-vaccination antipyretic use on specific antibody response to a BNT162b2 vaccine booster against COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the use of antipyretics was at the discretion of the participants, with 6–7 % reporting their use before receiving the monovalent and bivalent boosters. Although concerns exist that pre-vaccination antipyretic use might influence the emergence of adverse reactions, our previous research found no significant differences in the frequency of adverse reactions, including fever, based on antipyretic use before the monovalent booster [19] . Similar results were observed with the bivalent booster in this study as shown in Table s2 , suggesting that the presence of participants who used antipyretics before vaccination likely had a minimal impact on the primary outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Third, the use of antipyretics was at the discretion of the participants, with 6–7 % reporting their use before receiving the monovalent and bivalent boosters. Although concerns exist that pre-vaccination antipyretic use might influence the emergence of adverse reactions, our previous research found no significant differences in the frequency of adverse reactions, including fever, based on antipyretic use before the monovalent booster [19] . Similar results were observed with the bivalent booster in this study as shown in Table s2 , suggesting that the presence of participants who used antipyretics before vaccination likely had a minimal impact on the primary outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%