2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No tillage and bagasse mulching alter fungal biomass and community structure during decomposition of sugarcane leaf litter in Lampung Province, Sumatra, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The production of aboveground crop residue biomass can serve as a significant source of annual C input into the soil (Koga and Tsuji 2009). Previous studies have shown that the microbial biomass (PLFAs) in the top few centimeters of soil is usually greater under NT or reduced tillage than under CT for various climatic conditions and soil types (Feng et al 2003;Helgason et al 2010;Zhang et al 2012;Miura et al 2013). For example, the abundance of individual PLFA biomarkers under NT was 7 to 86 % greater than that under CT in the surface soils (0-5 cm depth) (Helgason et al 2010), which is consistent with our results (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Tillage On Soil Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of aboveground crop residue biomass can serve as a significant source of annual C input into the soil (Koga and Tsuji 2009). Previous studies have shown that the microbial biomass (PLFAs) in the top few centimeters of soil is usually greater under NT or reduced tillage than under CT for various climatic conditions and soil types (Feng et al 2003;Helgason et al 2010;Zhang et al 2012;Miura et al 2013). For example, the abundance of individual PLFA biomarkers under NT was 7 to 86 % greater than that under CT in the surface soils (0-5 cm depth) (Helgason et al 2010), which is consistent with our results (Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Tillage On Soil Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…good quality mulches that can mobilize high content of major nutrients, leading to improved soil fertility, and thus to increased yields (discussed in Chapters 4 and 5). Similar findings were reported by Borken and Matzner (2009) and Miura et al (2013). Different mulches have different effects in supplying nutrient contents to soils; variations are depended on quality of mulching materials, climatic conditions and soil types (discussed in Chapters 5).…”
Section: Potential For Expansion Of Sustainable Production Of High Qusupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The greater SOC content and total N in the treatments T4 and T5, particularly at Kibirizi and Karongi, indicated the potential of these mulches in C and N availability following the amounts of mulch biomass added to the soil (Adekiya et al, 2017;Agbede et al, 2014;Xavier et al, 2013). In favorable environmental conditions like at Karongi, the repeated drywet cycles may have enhanced faster microbial degradation of the mulch, resulting in increased C and N stocks and improved soil quality through nutrient recycling (Agbede et al, 2014;Khalil et al, 2005;Miura et al, 2013;Murungu et al, 2011;Xavier et al, 2013). Hence, this practice should be promoted to increase organic matter and biological N fixation to the soil.…”
Section: Effect Of Mulching On C and N Mineralization And Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All weeds at tillage treatments were suppressed by herbicide, whereas those at no-tillage treatments were hand picked. Soil fungal community structure clearly refl ected the treatment one-year after beginning the experiment, and there was an increase in soil carbon content (Miura et al 2013 ).…”
Section: Soil Biodiversity and Its Functioningmentioning
confidence: 97%