2013
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139208567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nobility and Kingship in Medieval England

Abstract: Nobility and Kingship in Medieval England is a major new account of the relationship between Edward I and his earls, and of the role of the English nobility in thirteenth-century governance. Re-evaluating crown-noble relations of the period, Spencer challenges traditional interpretations of Edward's reign, showing that his reputed masterfulness has been overplayed and that his kingship was far subtler, and therefore more effective, than this stereotype would suggest. Drawing from key earldoms such as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following lines give more details about the event. A note was entered ("et est sciendum quod…") to the effect that the fine of 60 sous to which Boschacius was sentenced for striking Johannet Bailliet atrociter with a bar (esparra), 94 as well as the 40-sous fine to be paid by the person who provided him with his weapon, were not accounted for because the case was pending in the court of appeals. The castellan is enjoined to recover these amounts once the appeal is decided, as best he can, and answer for these amounts in the next account ("tum injunctum est castellano quod finito termino appellationis recuperet condempnationes ut melius poterit et de ipsis computet in suo primo computo").…”
Section: The Institutional Dialogue Between the Castellan And The Central Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following lines give more details about the event. A note was entered ("et est sciendum quod…") to the effect that the fine of 60 sous to which Boschacius was sentenced for striking Johannet Bailliet atrociter with a bar (esparra), 94 as well as the 40-sous fine to be paid by the person who provided him with his weapon, were not accounted for because the case was pending in the court of appeals. The castellan is enjoined to recover these amounts once the appeal is decided, as best he can, and answer for these amounts in the next account ("tum injunctum est castellano quod finito termino appellationis recuperet condempnationes ut melius poterit et de ipsis computet in suo primo computo").…”
Section: The Institutional Dialogue Between the Castellan And The Central Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…93 Both Walter of Heylun and Bartholomew of Suthleye were royal justices, while Hugh of Stapleford was the sheriff of Buckingham. 94 There was even a representative of the main Exchequer -Roger of Northwood -who was assigned the task of scrutinising the Canterbury archa. 95 Nor was it just secular officers who were named.…”
Section: Dean a Irwinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation