1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(06)80089-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noble gas pumping by the TFTR graphite limiter

Abstract: The TFTR limiter is graphite, lt is possible to decrease the amouut of D trapped in the limiter by making plasma discharges with gas injected only as a prefill. When the limiter is deuterium depleted well enough by this technique for supershots (with RD~0.5-0.6) it pumps noble gases. The effective confinement time Xp* ranges from < 1 s for He down to 0.08 s for Kr. These noble gases escape from the limi[er slowly after the run. The partial pressure of Ar and Ne decay with time-constants of several hours, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, fuel balance measurements on plasmas, fuelled with helium showed that the fraction of helium recovered was very close to 100%. Energetically implanted helium is retained in carbon, but at lower concentrations than D and the retained He is thermally released at lower temperatures since it is not chemically bound to the C, i.e., it is less strongly bound than D [714,715]. The weaker binding of helium in carbon is due to the absence of chemical binding, which makes co-deposition ineffective at retaining helium.…”
Section: Insert Table 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, fuel balance measurements on plasmas, fuelled with helium showed that the fraction of helium recovered was very close to 100%. Energetically implanted helium is retained in carbon, but at lower concentrations than D and the retained He is thermally released at lower temperatures since it is not chemically bound to the C, i.e., it is less strongly bound than D [714,715]. The weaker binding of helium in carbon is due to the absence of chemical binding, which makes co-deposition ineffective at retaining helium.…”
Section: Insert Table 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the fusion power in these plasmas ( -5 MW) is modest by reactor standards, the on-axis helium ash source strength is comparable to that expected for ITER. Also, while a reactorrelevant helium pumping scheme needs to be developed, the TFTR bumper limiter pumps helium and other noble gases [8]. These facts enable the study of a prototypical reactor with all the essential elements as they pertain to ash birth, transport, and removal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%