Recently, using near‐infrared spectra of Venus obtained from a high‐altitude balloon, Bottema, Plummer, Strong, and Zander have concluded that the Venus clouds are composed of H2O ice. This conclusion was supported by Sagan and Pollack, who, moreover, bracketed the particle radii between 7.5 and 10 μ. Because it contradicts previous statements by Kuiper and Moroz that H2O ice is not present, we decided to re‐examine the relevant spectroscopic data and their interpretations. To assist us, Miller and Boese recorded long path absorption spectra of pure CO2 gas. Two salient features emerge from our study: the absence of any absorption other than CO2 both at 1.5 μ and at 2.0 μ. Since cirrus and laboratory ice clouds both exhibit strong absorptions centered at these wavelengths, it is clear that the Venus clouds cannot be similar to these. There remains a possibility that the major scatterers could be H2O ice—if the particle sizes are submicron, the absorption bands would diminish in intensity. It is argued, however, that the existence of the required abundance of such particles on a planet‐wide basis is improbable. Accordingly the major scatterers of radiation are almost certainly not composed of H2O ice. Various candidates for the particles are mentioned, but no positive spectroscopic evidence to support a particular one is advanced.