2014
DOI: 10.1186/1880-5981-66-98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noctilucent clouds observed from the ground: sensitivity to mesospheric parameters and long-term time series

Abstract: Long-term systematic observations of noctilucent clouds in the regions of Moscow (Russia), Vilnius (Lithuania), and La Ronge (Canada) are considered. Variables, describing the seasonal activity of noctilucent clouds, are discussed. It is shown that there are no statistically significant trends within time intervals of several recent decades. This result is compared to other known findings on trends in mesospheric clouds. Based on the data of the modern ground-based noctilucent cloud observing network in the no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have demonstrated the presence of about zero and small positive long‐term trends in the corrected NLC number and brightness, respectively, for the period of 1968–2018 (the continuous time series for 51 years); both trends lack statistical significance, meaning that the trends may readily change at other time intervals. These results are consistent with previously established long‐term trends by ground‐based NLC observations at middle latitudes around the globe, which were found to be either about zero or slightly positive and statistically insignificant (Dalin et al, ; Dubietis et al, ; Kirkwood et al, ; Kirkwood & Stebel, ; Pertsev et al, ; Romejko et al, ; Zalcik et al, , ). Lübken and Berger () have also found about zero trend in the NLC occurrence rate and a small positive trend in the NLC brightness at the midlatitude of 54°N for 1961–1994 using LIMA model simulations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have demonstrated the presence of about zero and small positive long‐term trends in the corrected NLC number and brightness, respectively, for the period of 1968–2018 (the continuous time series for 51 years); both trends lack statistical significance, meaning that the trends may readily change at other time intervals. These results are consistent with previously established long‐term trends by ground‐based NLC observations at middle latitudes around the globe, which were found to be either about zero or slightly positive and statistically insignificant (Dalin et al, ; Dubietis et al, ; Kirkwood et al, ; Kirkwood & Stebel, ; Pertsev et al, ; Romejko et al, ; Zalcik et al, , ). Lübken and Berger () have also found about zero trend in the NLC occurrence rate and a small positive trend in the NLC brightness at the midlatitude of 54°N for 1961–1994 using LIMA model simulations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At the second step, the following multiple regression analysis (MRA) was applied to all analyzed time series: Y=C0+C1)(t2000+C2FLya)(ttlag where C 0 is the constant, C 1 and C 2 are the regression coefficients characterizing the linear long‐term trend (Value/year, V/yr) and solar activity term (Value/SFU, solar Ly‐α flux units, 1 SFU is 10 11 photons · s −1 · cm −2 ), t lag is the phase time lag between an atmospheric parameter and solar activity predetermined based on the cross‐correlation analysis, and F Lya is the Lyman α flux averaged over either the winter or summer season. The same MRA technique has been frequently utilized in geophysical data analysis (e.g., DeLand & Thomas, ; Dubietis et al, ; Kirkwood et al, ; Pertsev et al, ).…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observational database on NLC/PMC including microphysical properties, variations with latitude and longitude, solar cycle, and tides has improved significantly in recent decades (see, e.g., Baumgarten et al, 2012;Fiedler et al, 2009;Gerding et al, 2013;Russell et al, 2015). However, the unequivocal detection of trends in NLC is still challenged due to the impact of various processes varying mainly in the last decades, for example, stratospheric ozone mixing ratios or water vapor transport through the tropical tropopause into the stratosphere (Brinkop et al, 2016;Lübken et al, 2013;Pertsev et al, 2014;WMO, 2011). However, the unequivocal detection of trends in NLC is still challenged due to the impact of various processes varying mainly in the last decades, for example, stratospheric ozone mixing ratios or water vapor transport through the tropical tropopause into the stratosphere (Brinkop et al, 2016;Lübken et al, 2013;Pertsev et al, 2014;WMO, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%