2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodal Stage of Surgically Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Effect on Recurrence Patterns and Overall Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, factors predictive of first DM within prognostically unfavorable sites were nonsquamous histology for liver and a delay between diagnoses and RT and advanced initial stage for bone (Table 2). Our observed frequency of DM failure (42%) is consistent with that presented in other studies assessing treated with definitive radiation (ranging 33-59%) [1][2][3] and higher than those assessing definitive surgical management (range 23-42%) [16][17][18]. Predictors of DM after definitive treatment for NSCLC have been elucidated in a number of reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, factors predictive of first DM within prognostically unfavorable sites were nonsquamous histology for liver and a delay between diagnoses and RT and advanced initial stage for bone (Table 2). Our observed frequency of DM failure (42%) is consistent with that presented in other studies assessing treated with definitive radiation (ranging 33-59%) [1][2][3] and higher than those assessing definitive surgical management (range 23-42%) [16][17][18]. Predictors of DM after definitive treatment for NSCLC have been elucidated in a number of reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Each visit included a medical history, physical examination, complete blood count, chest and upper abdominal computed tomography (CT), brain magnetic resonance imaging/CT and a bone scan (if deemed to be necessary due to complaint of pain). Local recurrence was defined as disease relapse at the BS, ipsilateral hilum and mediastinum; all other sites of failure, including the supraclavicular fossa and contralateral hilum, were considered to be distant metastases (24,25). Disease progression was diagnosed with confirmed biopsy or positive imaging findings.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PORT is considered on a case-by-case basis and may be recommended particularly for patients with good performance status, close margins, advanced T stage, limited lymph node dissection, and/or multiple station N2 disease. However, further studies are needed to better define patient subsets that are more likely to derive benefit from PORT 17, 18. Additionally, molecular markers are needed to identify patients who are at a higher risk for LRR versus DM recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%