2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-011-1094-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodal status—its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer

Abstract: Main intention of primary surgery is R0 resection with best prognosis in advanced stages. A systematic lymphadenectomy in cases with R0 resection or residual tumor <1 cm seems to be reasonable with positive impact on prognosis. Node status has impact on prognosis in patients with negative node after R0 resection with best PFS in FIGO III. Further prospective studies had to show whether systematic lymphadenectomy in suboptimally tumor-reduced patients can improve prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study also showed that optimal cytoreduction was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with stage III disease. Bachmann et al [13] reported that the influence of LN metastasis on prognosis decreases with the increase in residual tumor volume. The authors also reported that the nodal status seemed to be the next most important prognostic factor for advanced-stage ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study also showed that optimal cytoreduction was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with stage III disease. Bachmann et al [13] reported that the influence of LN metastasis on prognosis decreases with the increase in residual tumor volume. The authors also reported that the nodal status seemed to be the next most important prognostic factor for advanced-stage ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with EOC, prognosis is determined based on analysis of cancer-related risk factors. A wide variety of features of high-risk cancer, including size of the tumor, size of the residual tumor 2 , stage of the cancer 5 , lymph node status 6 , histologic type 7 , histologic grade 8 , malignant ascites 9 , and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels 10 are considered essential for predicting cancer-specific survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic relevance of lymph node metastases in primary ovarian cancer is unclear, although seen as an important prognostic factor for advanced-stage ovarian cancer, there is contradictory data on survival after systematic lymphadenectomy versus bulky node resection [19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%