2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodding and shaking of the head as simulated approach and avoidance responses

Abstract: Simulation of vertical and horizontal head movements during semantic and affective evaluation of linguistic stimuli is investigated in explicit and implicit tasks. • Motion detection software is implemented to allow participants to assess the stimuli with head movements. • Accepted stimuli were evaluated faster with vertical head movements and refused stimuli with horizontal head movements. • Semantic evaluation activated the simulation of the vertical and horizontal head movements as gestures having a communi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(157 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very similar to emotional facial expressions, conversational facial expressions, such as the nod and the head shake, are widely recognized across cultures too, and provide the perceiver with information about the expresser's cognitive state and intentions [101][102][103]. More specifically, in the context of social interaction, a nod communicates agreement or cooperativeness, whereas a head shake communicates disagreement or unwillingness to cooperate [104][105][106][107][108][109].…”
Section: Proposed Ehmi Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very similar to emotional facial expressions, conversational facial expressions, such as the nod and the head shake, are widely recognized across cultures too, and provide the perceiver with information about the expresser's cognitive state and intentions [101][102][103]. More specifically, in the context of social interaction, a nod communicates agreement or cooperativeness, whereas a head shake communicates disagreement or unwillingness to cooperate [104][105][106][107][108][109].…”
Section: Proposed Ehmi Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the pedestrian would make the association between disagreement/unwillingness to cooperate and denying passage and would thus not proceed to cross the street in front of the oncoming vehicle. Furthermore, all three expressions-angry, surprised, and head shake-are social stimuli that elicit an avoidance tendency in the perceiver due to the presumed costs of interacting with an individual that exhibits the negative qualities assigned to said facial expressions [99,100,108,109,111,[118][119][120][121]. In the context of traffic interaction, this tendency would translate to an intention on the part of the pedestrian not to cross the street in front of the oncoming vehicle.…”
Section: Proposed Ehmi Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversational facial expressions, such as the nod and the head shake, are universally utilized for providing information about an expresser's cognitive state and intentions [102][103][104]. For instance, during social interactions, a nod is produced to communicate agreement or cooperativeness, whereas a head shake is produced to communicate disagreement or unwillingness to cooperate [105][106][107][108][109][110]. Fittingly, a driver could also decide to nod at a pedestrian to let them know they will be yielded to [1,3,4].…”
Section: Facial Expressions and Vehicle Yielding Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%