2011 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iv.2011.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node-attribute Graph Layout for Small-World Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Small-world networks are a very commonly occurring type of graph in the real-world, which exhibit a clustered structure that is not well represented by current graph layout algorithms. In many cases we also have information about the nodes in such graphs, which are typically depicted on the graph as node colour, shape or size. Here we demonstrate that these attributes can instead be used to layout the graph in highdimensional data space. Then using a dimension reduction technique, targeted projection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Force‐based approaches have been extended in various ways to further enforce the implicit grouping of nodes for disjoint flat groups [BC01, DKM06, DM14b, Noa07]. In general graph layout algorithms, a generic approach to consider disjoint or overlapping groups / is to use pseudo (dummy) vertices that represent sets of vertices and are connected to all contained vertices [EFN99, EH00, GF11]. For disjoint groups , another method is based on a divide‐and‐conquer strategy [ACJM03, AMA07b, EF97, FT04]: first, a meta‐layout is derived for an aggregated graph with collapsed groups; then, the vertices of each group are laid out independently.…”
Section: Implicit Encodings Of Vertex Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force‐based approaches have been extended in various ways to further enforce the implicit grouping of nodes for disjoint flat groups [BC01, DKM06, DM14b, Noa07]. In general graph layout algorithms, a generic approach to consider disjoint or overlapping groups / is to use pseudo (dummy) vertices that represent sets of vertices and are connected to all contained vertices [EFN99, EH00, GF11]. For disjoint groups , another method is based on a divide‐and‐conquer strategy [ACJM03, AMA07b, EF97, FT04]: first, a meta‐layout is derived for an aggregated graph with collapsed groups; then, the vertices of each group are laid out independently.…”
Section: Implicit Encodings Of Vertex Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent methods which also use the idea of dimension reduction are EdgeMaps by Dork et al Targeted projection pursuit for graphs 134 also considers multiple node-attributes and relates each one to a dimension. Initially, nodes are laid out using a PCA projection based on the nodeattributes.…”
Section: Mapping Attributes Directly To Two-dimensional Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent methods that also use the idea of dimension reduction are EdgeMaps by Dork et al 133 and Gibson and Faith’s 134 application of targeted projection pursuit (TPP) to graph layout. The aim of EdgeMaps was to unite the visualisation of node–link diagrams that show the explicit relationships between nodes in the graph and multi-dimensional scaling techniques used to visualise implicit relationships, i.e.…”
Section: Constraint-based Layoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users can then use a table on the right-hand side of the tool to identify which attributes are contributing most significantly to the projection. An extension to this where the user is able to show a set of edges in a graph, thus positioning the nodes in the projection becomes a graph layout method, has already been published [2].…”
Section: Extending Tppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task, through the use of firewall and intrusion detection system logs, is to identify the noteworthy events in the system, any security trends, the root causes of the problems and, following this, to recommend actions to prevent this happening again in the future. The approach taken has been to adapt this data into a node-attribute graph and to use an extended version of targeted projection pursuit (TPP) [1,2] to analyse this data as a graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%