2005
DOI: 10.1093/jee/98.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node-Injury Scale to Evaluate Root Injury by Corn Rootworms (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Abstract: Corn rootworm larval feeding on corn roots can significantly reduce grain yield by interfering with photosynthetic rates, limiting the uptake of water and nutrients, and by increasing the plant's susceptibility to lodging. Of the techniques developed to measure the efficacy of corn rootworm larval control tactics, root damage ratings have generally been adopted as the standard because sampling roots is relatively efficient. Historically, the primary scales used for scoring root injury from corn rootworm larval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
187
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each field, the presence of rootworm-active Bt toxin in each maize plant sampled was verified based on ELISA (Envirologix). Rootworm injury was quantified based on the 0-3 node-injury scale (34), and any plants that did not test positive for Bt toxin were not evaluated for root injury (6 of 180 plants). For fields with an average root injury of greater than one node, we mapped the county within Iowa that contained the field by plotting GPS coordinates in Google Earth (Google, Inc.) and then manually transferring the location, accurate to the level of an individual county, to a map of Iowa (Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa Geological Survey).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each field, the presence of rootworm-active Bt toxin in each maize plant sampled was verified based on ELISA (Envirologix). Rootworm injury was quantified based on the 0-3 node-injury scale (34), and any plants that did not test positive for Bt toxin were not evaluated for root injury (6 of 180 plants). For fields with an average root injury of greater than one node, we mapped the county within Iowa that contained the field by plotting GPS coordinates in Google Earth (Google, Inc.) and then manually transferring the location, accurate to the level of an individual county, to a map of Iowa (Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa Geological Survey).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of rootworm active Bt toxin in each corn plant was tested with ELISA using a kit (Envirologix, Portland, ME), and for the majority of fields, a mixture of Bt and non-Bt corn plants were sampled (Table 1). Soil was washed from roots, and roots were rated for rootworm feeding injury following the 0 to 3 node injury scale of Oleson et al (2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c Mean 6 SD for root injury on a 0 to 3 node injury scale (Oleson et al 2005). Numbers in parentheses are sample sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 120 plants were sampled at each location during each year (5 plants per eight-row treatment plot ϫ 2 maize hybrids ϫ 3 insecticide treatments ϫ 4 blocks). Injury was scored based on a node-injury scale (Oleson et al 2005) that ranges from zero (no feeding injury) to three nodes of root tissue injured (heavy feeding injury). The center four rows of each eight-row plot were harvested, and mass of grain was converted to metric tons per ha at 15.5% moisture (United States no.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%