2013
DOI: 10.1108/00220411311295315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of the research reported here is to improve comprehension of the socially-negotiated identity of concepts in the domain of knowledge organization. Because knowledge organization as a domain has as its focus the order of concepts, both from a theoretical perspective and from an applied perspective, it is important to understand how the domain itself understands the meaning of a concept. Design/methodology/approach-The paper provides an empirical demonstration of how the domain itself underst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sentiment analysis is about understanding the extent to which a concept is semantically proximate to sentiment words generally, as well as the extent to which a concept is semantically proximate to positive versus negative words. In terms of our theoretical framework, we agree that the definition of a concept used in concept mapping is itself the result of epistemologies [ 75 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sentiment analysis is about understanding the extent to which a concept is semantically proximate to sentiment words generally, as well as the extent to which a concept is semantically proximate to positive versus negative words. In terms of our theoretical framework, we agree that the definition of a concept used in concept mapping is itself the result of epistemologies [ 75 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are different understandings of what a concept, in the context of a vocabulary or ontology, is, and systems for knowledge organization differ accordingly; see, for example, Hjørland () and Friedman and Smiraglia (). Concept analysis is here used to test the extent to which concepts in the GO are stable, context‐free, and value‐free, as its declared basis of ontological realism would seem to require.…”
Section: Concept Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abroad study on knowledge map is conducted deeply. Microsoft started to Supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2012ZX04011-011) construct knowledge map as early as 1995 while Siemens took the knowledge map as a principle part of their knowledge management system [17][18][19] . In the research area of process knowledge in China, Xue Hao built a process knowledge map model contains resources layer, attribute layer, and display layer to resolve problems of knowledge sharing and reusing [20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%