2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodular sillimanite rocks as field indicators to metamorphosed massive sulfide deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this contribution, we evaluate the geological setting along with the major and trace element studies of various rock types (including metamorphosed hydrothermally altered rocks and granitoids), the compositions of minerals in the sulphide-bearing units and attendant alteration, and the sulphur isotope ratios of sulphides in various deposits. The present contribution complements previous studies on aspects of the geology of these occurrences, including the descriptive geology of the deposits by Sheridan and Raymond (1984a, 1984b), the genetic relationship of gahnite to sulphide mineralization (Heimann et al 2005), the origin of gedrite-garnet-cordierite rocks at the Evergreen prospect (Heimann et al 2006), and the genetic relationship of nodular sillimanite rocks to sulphide mineralization (Spry et al 2022b). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the origin of the various deposits and to provide exploration tools that can potentially be used as guides to further mineralization in regionally metamorphosed rocks in south-central Colorado.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this contribution, we evaluate the geological setting along with the major and trace element studies of various rock types (including metamorphosed hydrothermally altered rocks and granitoids), the compositions of minerals in the sulphide-bearing units and attendant alteration, and the sulphur isotope ratios of sulphides in various deposits. The present contribution complements previous studies on aspects of the geology of these occurrences, including the descriptive geology of the deposits by Sheridan and Raymond (1984a, 1984b), the genetic relationship of gahnite to sulphide mineralization (Heimann et al 2005), the origin of gedrite-garnet-cordierite rocks at the Evergreen prospect (Heimann et al 2006), and the genetic relationship of nodular sillimanite rocks to sulphide mineralization (Spry et al 2022b). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the origin of the various deposits and to provide exploration tools that can potentially be used as guides to further mineralization in regionally metamorphosed rocks in south-central Colorado.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although nodular sillimanite rocks and gahnite-bearing rocks are spatially associated with several deposits listed in Table 1, they were the focus of studies by Spry et al . (2022b) and Heimann et al (2005), respectively, and will only be discussed here as they relate to the origin of the deposits and their potential as exploration guides to metallic mineralization. Note we use the term ‘gahnite’ here for zinc-bearing spinels regardless of the Zn-Fe-Mg proportion, which was shown by Heimann et al (2005) to be variable in composition for deposits in Colorado.…”
Section: Local Geology Of Mineral Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Walters, 1996;Walters et al 2002;Spry & Teale, 2021) or deposits that are possibly transitional between Sedex and VMS deposits (e.g. Walters, 1998;Leach et al 2005;Spry et al 2010). Epigenetic models revolve around the introduction of metals during peak metamorphism or by post-tectonic replacement (e.g.…”
Section: A Previous Genetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walters, 1996;Walters et al 2002;Spry & Teale, 2021) or deposits that are possibly transitional between Sedex and VMS deposits (e.g. Walters, 1998;Leach et al 2005;Spry et al 2010).…”
Section: A Previous Genetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%