2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise estimation in parallel MRI: GRAPPA and SENSE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4-(b). This pattern follows the shape of some real patterns found in SENSE acquisitions (Aja-Fernández et al (2014); Aja-Fernández and Vegas-SanchezFerrero (2016)). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4-(b). This pattern follows the shape of some real patterns found in SENSE acquisitions (Aja-Fernández et al (2014); Aja-Fernández and Vegas-SanchezFerrero (2016)). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The final value of the variance of noise at each point will depend on the covariance matrix between coils of the original data (prior to reconstruction) and on the sensitivity map of each coil, but not on the data themselves. This model has been observed for SENSE by different authors through experimental and theoretical studies (see for instance the studies in Pruessmann et al (1999); Thunberg and Zetterberg (2007); Robson et al (2008); Aja-Fernández et al (2014)). …”
Section: The Non-stationary Rician Noise Model In Mrimentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, while the data energy of our global tractography method assumes Gaussian noise, the noise model in real data is Rice or noncentral χ distributed, depending on the acquisition, and may bias the reconstruction (Gudbjartsson and Patz, 1995;Aja-Fernández et al, 2014). However, by estimating the tissue response functions from the data under the same assumption, the kernels incorporate this noise bias as well, and represent not the actual tissue response, but 345 rather expectations of the actual response under non-Gaussian noise.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%