1978
DOI: 10.1080/00140137808931723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Exposure, Monitoring and Tracking Performance as a Function of Signal Bias and Task Priority

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it seems that decline was more pronounced for the noise condition becauseof a greater percentage of false responses during the first period. This finding was in line with the results ofthe early effects of noise on tracking behaviour, noted by Loeb and Jons (1978). It seems likely that the reducing effects ofnoise on false responses appeared to be more severe during the first period of the task for 'doubtful' responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, it seems that decline was more pronounced for the noise condition becauseof a greater percentage of false responses during the first period. This finding was in line with the results ofthe early effects of noise on tracking behaviour, noted by Loeb and Jons (1978). It seems likely that the reducing effects ofnoise on false responses appeared to be more severe during the first period of the task for 'doubtful' responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Hockey's task involved a tracking task with simultaneous reaction to peripheral lights, and it was the latter task which showed a deterioration in noise. Loeb & Jones (1978) failed to replicate Hockey's results but found that noise affected the tracking task instead of reaction to peripheral lights. This difference can be explained in terms of the difference in frequency with which the tracking task required attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Unfortunately, other studies have failed to replicate the effects of noise on selectivity in memory and attention. For example, Forster & Grierson (1978) and Loeb & Jones (1978) were unable to replicate the results of Hockey (1970), although it should be noted that they used tasks with a different level of difficulty from the original study. Similarly, Smith (1982) demonstrated that the effects of task priority are easily modified, which in turn changes the effects of noise.…”
Section: Noise and Selectivit_y In Attentionmentioning
confidence: 85%