2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02351035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise from implantable Cooper cable

Abstract: Cooper cable is made for implanted devices, usually for connection to stimulating electrodes. An experiment has been performed to see whether these cables would be satisfactory for recording electroneurogram (ENG) signals from cuffs. Four cables were subjected to continuous flexion at 2 Hz while submerged in saline. The cables were connected to a low-noise amplifier, and the noise was measured using a spectrum analyser. These cables had not fractured after 184 million flexions, and the noise in the neural band… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can cause spikes up to 40 µV, which can be interpreted as neural activity [84,85]. Movement has also been shown to increase the noise level in cables, presumably due to leakage between the cores [86]. Thus, relative movement of leads, especially those comprising insulation mat erials with dissimilar charge affinity should be avoided.…”
Section: 332interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can cause spikes up to 40 µV, which can be interpreted as neural activity [84,85]. Movement has also been shown to increase the noise level in cables, presumably due to leakage between the cores [86]. Thus, relative movement of leads, especially those comprising insulation mat erials with dissimilar charge affinity should be avoided.…”
Section: 332interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no standards for characterization of noise and interferences regarding implant components as connectors or cables. However, the experience shared by some publications can help to assess those phenomena [81,85,86].…”
Section: 332interferencementioning
confidence: 99%