1988
DOI: 10.3109/00016488809102853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise-induced Vasoconstriction in the Cochlea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although fixation may induce variation in strial capillary lumenal diameter, this was not observed in control tissues. Increased capillary lumenal diameters following noise exposure and fixation have been reported previously [41] and by casting techniques [42]. Intriguingly, vasodilation is not a prerequisite of sound-enhanced trans-strial trafficking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although fixation may induce variation in strial capillary lumenal diameter, this was not observed in control tissues. Increased capillary lumenal diameters following noise exposure and fixation have been reported previously [41] and by casting techniques [42]. Intriguingly, vasodilation is not a prerequisite of sound-enhanced trans-strial trafficking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These results point to a noise-induced cochlear metabolic disturbance or to a me chanical lesion producing hearing loss. A declined blood flow in the basal turn of the guinea pig's cochlea after 1 h exposure to a 12-kHz tone has been demonstrated using a laser Doppler flowmeter [20], as well as a noise-induced vasoconstriction in the cochlea using a blood vessel casting method and scanning electron microscopy [21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this hearing loss is thought to occur in the peripheral organ. The mechanisms may include synaptic fatigue (Mulroy et al, 1990), metabolic fatigue of either the stria vascularis or hair cells (Canlon and Schacht, 1983), changes in cochlear blood flow (Nakai and Masutani, 1988) and non-detectable morphological disruption of mechanoelectrical channels (Patuzzi, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%