11th Aeroacoustics Conference 1987
DOI: 10.2514/6.1987-2657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise of a model high speed counterrotation propeller at simulated takeoff/approach conditions (F7/A7)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While turbofan engines have been the most commonly used aircraft engines since the early 1950s, as a result of the increased fuel prices of the 1970s, the development of other economically feasible propulsion technologies has been investigated [1]. Due to its superior propulsive efficiency, one of the main contenders as an alternative to the currently used turbofan technology is the Counter-Rotating Open Rotor (CROR) [1,2]. Applying them on certain categories of aircraft would lead to a considerable reduction in fuel consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While turbofan engines have been the most commonly used aircraft engines since the early 1950s, as a result of the increased fuel prices of the 1970s, the development of other economically feasible propulsion technologies has been investigated [1]. Due to its superior propulsive efficiency, one of the main contenders as an alternative to the currently used turbofan technology is the Counter-Rotating Open Rotor (CROR) [1,2]. Applying them on certain categories of aircraft would lead to a considerable reduction in fuel consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prominence of self-noise over interaction noise depends on the flight condition [2,3]; self-noise is largely dominating at cruise condition, whereas interaction noise is significant if not dominant at takeoff condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980's, this effect was documented with an earlier set of blades. The same 2-forward blade count plus 1-aft blade count shaft order tone was found to be most sensitive to rotor spacing, see Figure 16 of [19].…”
Section: Figure 7 Effect Of Aft Rotor Phase On Inter-rotor Velocity mentioning
confidence: 83%