2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise robust image edge detection based upon the automatic anisotropic Gaussian kernels

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an illustration, Figure 1b displays an FDAG kernel, which is visually different from the corresponding isotropic kernel shown in Figure 1a. Existing FDAG-based methods [19] build a bank of FDAG kernels by setting the anisotropy factor and the direction with possible values. Subsequently, a family of responses is obtained by convolving each kernel with the image.…”
Section: Anisotropic Gaussian Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an illustration, Figure 1b displays an FDAG kernel, which is visually different from the corresponding isotropic kernel shown in Figure 1a. Existing FDAG-based methods [19] build a bank of FDAG kernels by setting the anisotropy factor and the direction with possible values. Subsequently, a family of responses is obtained by convolving each kernel with the image.…”
Section: Anisotropic Gaussian Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com/ASD) [44], and the neuronal structures in electron microscopy stacks dataset (NSEMS; http://brainiac2.mit.edu/isbi_challenge/home) [45]. In addition, in order to explore the impact of different kinds of edge strength on the segmentation accuracy, we also tested the SH methods that incorporate edge strength obtained by the structured forest edge (SH+SFE) method [28], the sparseness-constrained color-opponency (SH+SCO) method [26], the automated anisotropic Gaussian kernel (SH+AAGK) method [19], and the surrounded-modulation edge detection (SH+SED) method [27]. Furthermore, we also selected the widely used SLIC method [8] for comparison.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2016 ), ant colony optimization ( Liu. & Fang, 2015 ), Cellular Automata ( Amrogowicz et al, 2016 ), Anisotropic Gaussian Kernels ( Zhang et al, 2017b ), and different edge detection approaches ( Sun et al, 2016 ;Zhang et al, 2017a ;Zareizadeh et. al., 2013 ) have also been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, Google Earth software is used to obtain the regional image of the reservoir, and multiple local images are combined into a complete wide-field-of-view of the reservoir by means of image stitching [1][2][3]. Secondly, the edge-detection method [4][5][6][7] is used to detect the water edge in the image. Then the water edge information is extracted and saved as relevant files.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%