1985
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1684(85)90002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise suppression by spectral magnitude estimation —mechanism and theoretical limits—

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From a perceptual point of view, the information we get from the phase is insignificant compared to the information obtained from the speech spectral amplitude [22]. Thus, it seems more suitable to estimate the speech spectral amplitude instead of the complex spectrum.…”
Section: Optimal Nonlinear Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From a perceptual point of view, the information we get from the phase is insignificant compared to the information obtained from the speech spectral amplitude [22]. Thus, it seems more suitable to estimate the speech spectral amplitude instead of the complex spectrum.…”
Section: Optimal Nonlinear Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it seems that this conclusion holds as long as local signal to noise ratio is at least about 6 dB [65]. Most single-microphone noise reduction techniques rely on the assumption of unimportance of phase.…”
Section: Single Microphone Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies shows that accurate spectral amplitude estimation plays a more important role than improving the phase spectrum in the sense of the perceived signal quality [9]. Furthermore, [10] showed that phase becomes important when phase deviation is larger than around π 4 , i.e. when the local signal-to-noise ratio is lower than 6 decibels, where roughness is perceived in the reconstructed signal.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%