2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.06.20055384
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noisy Pooled PCR for Virus Testing

Abstract: Fast testing can help mitigate the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Despite their accuracy for single sample analysis, infectious diseases diagnostic tools, like RT-PCR, require substantial resources to test large populations. We develop a scalable approach for determining the viral status of pooled patient samples. Our approach converts group testing to a linear inverse problem, where false positives and negatives are interpreted as generated by a noisy communication channel, and a message passing algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive results are detected by the cleavage of the reporter on the probe and amplification of fluorescence enhancement. However, the accurate results of this technique may strongly depend on the onset time of symptoms and the specimens and routes of sampling (34,35). Furthermore, successive amplification of the viral genome in the suspected patient can be interpreted as a positive result when the cycle threshold value raises in > 40 cycles, otherwise, the result may be considered as negative (36).…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Molecular Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive results are detected by the cleavage of the reporter on the probe and amplification of fluorescence enhancement. However, the accurate results of this technique may strongly depend on the onset time of symptoms and the specimens and routes of sampling (34,35). Furthermore, successive amplification of the viral genome in the suspected patient can be interpreted as a positive result when the cycle threshold value raises in > 40 cycles, otherwise, the result may be considered as negative (36).…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Molecular Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%