2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.95.022106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noisy quantum walks of two indistinguishable interacting particles

Abstract: We investigate the dynamics of continuous-time two-particle quantum walks on a one-dimensional noisy lattice. Depending on the initial condition, we show how the interplay between particle indistinguishability and interaction determines distinct propagation regimes. A realistic model for the environment is considered by introducing non-Gaussian noise as time-dependent fluctuations of the tunneling amplitudes between adjacent sites. We observe that the combined effect of particle interaction and fast noise (wea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our choice for the noise is motivated by its relevance in systems of interest for quantum information processing [17][18][19][20][21], and by the fact that RTN is at the root of the 1/ f noise affecting superconducting qubits [22]. In recent years some works have addressed the properties of CTQWs on the one-dimensional lattice subject to random telegraph noise [23][24][25][26], also in the presence of spatial correlations [27]. In this paper we analyze the effects of RTN on spatial search on graphs with generic topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our choice for the noise is motivated by its relevance in systems of interest for quantum information processing [17][18][19][20][21], and by the fact that RTN is at the root of the 1/ f noise affecting superconducting qubits [22]. In recent years some works have addressed the properties of CTQWs on the one-dimensional lattice subject to random telegraph noise [23][24][25][26], also in the presence of spatial correlations [27]. In this paper we analyze the effects of RTN on spatial search on graphs with generic topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as explained in the following. Indeed, the isotropy requirement implies that A k=0 commutes with the representation of the isotropy group L, whence we can classify the QW by requiring identity (9) and then multiplying the QW operator A on the left by (I ⊗V ), with V unitary commuting with the representation of L. In the case that the representation is irreducible, then by Schur lemma we have only V = I s . From now on we will restrict to s = 2, which corresponds to the simplest nontrivial QW in the case of G Abelian.…”
Section: Quantum Walks On Cayley Graphs Of Z Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently the possibility of implementing actual quantum simulations of quantum fields [2][3][4][5] has been accompanied by novel approaches to foundations of the theory [6][7][8][9], including its derivation from informational principles [1,10] and the recovery of its Lorentz covariance [11]. This has provided a progress in the research based on the idea originally proposed by Feynman [12] of recovering physics as pure quantum information processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of quantum random walks in noisy environments have played a fundamental role in understanding non-trivial quantum phenomena observed in an interdisciplinary framework of studies ranging from biology [1,2], chemistry [3], materials science [4] and electronics [5], to photonics [6][7][8][9] and ultracold matter [10,11]. For many years, most of the research efforts had been focused on the propagation of single particles [12]; however, a great interest in describing the dynamics of correlated particles in noisy systems has recently arisen [13][14][15][16], mainly because it has been recognized that many-particle quantum correlations can be preserved in noisy networks by properly controlling the initial state of the particles, their statistics, indistinguishability or their type of interaction [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%