although I will attempt to foreground the precariousness of my position throughout, I know such gestures can never suffice. (Spivak, 1988: 271) what I find useful is the sustained and developing work on the mechanics of the constitution of the Other; we can use it to much greater analytic and interventionist advantage than invocations of the authenticity of the Other. (Spivak, 1988: 294; emphasis in original) Any response, is inevitably, always already (Althusser, 1971), an intra-action entanglement (Barad, 2007). Therefore, my entanglement with, the 'Intimate Others and the Othering of intimates: The gendered psycho-politics of the entangled relational' (Dalal, 2020) was in process before its existence and publication. In this case, the intimate Other is you Farhad Dalal (if I may, address you directly, intimately?) and your 'gendered entangled relational with the intimate Other', which is fittingly complex, because I happen to be a woman of colour and lesbian. And, yet already, my framing of who I am is fraught with problems-problems, which I attempt to explore in this response. For example, the terms 'other', 'woman', 'colour' and 'lesbian' are territorial in claiming an identity position and differentiation. My claims 969592G AQ0010.