2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1047951108002795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomenclature for congenital and paediatric cardiac disease: Historical perspectives and The International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code

Abstract: Clinicians working in the field of congenital and paediatric cardiology have long felt the need for a common diagnostic and therapeutic nomenclature and coding system with which to classify patients of all ages with congenital and acquired cardiac disease. A cohesive and comprehensive system of nomenclature, suitable for setting a global standard for multicentric analysis of outcomes and stratification of risk, has only recently emerged, namely, The International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. This re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiac lesions were classified according to the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. 10 Further information was collected on prior surgical repair and re-operation, pre-pregnancy haemodynamic status was assessed by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and clinical reports, and the NYHA functional class pre-pregnancy was ascertained. 11 Adverse cardiac events were classified as cardiac complications as follows: maternal cardiac death, pulmonary oedema (documented on physical examination or radiography), treated arrhythmia (RT, sustained arrhythmia requiring treatment), venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, valve thrombosis, endocarditis, reduced NYHA functional class from baseline, invasive treatment (invasive cardiac intervention during pregnancy or within 6 months of delivery) and arrhythmia not treated (RNT, unsustained arrhythmia not requiring treatment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac lesions were classified according to the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. 10 Further information was collected on prior surgical repair and re-operation, pre-pregnancy haemodynamic status was assessed by echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and clinical reports, and the NYHA functional class pre-pregnancy was ascertained. 11 Adverse cardiac events were classified as cardiac complications as follows: maternal cardiac death, pulmonary oedema (documented on physical examination or radiography), treated arrhythmia (RT, sustained arrhythmia requiring treatment), venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, valve thrombosis, endocarditis, reduced NYHA functional class from baseline, invasive treatment (invasive cardiac intervention during pregnancy or within 6 months of delivery) and arrhythmia not treated (RNT, unsustained arrhythmia not requiring treatment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative, operative, and outcomes data are collected on all patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery at participating centers. Coding for this database is accomplished by clinicians and ancillary support staff using the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code [8,9] and is entered into the contemporary version of the STS-CHSD data collection form (DCF). [10] The Duke Clinical Research Institute serves as the data warehouse and analytic center for all STS National Databases.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that the database represents approximately 93% of all United States centers that perform congenital heart surgery and greater than 96% of all operations 17 . Coding within the database is performed by clinicians and ancillary support staff using the International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code 18 and is entered into the STS-CHSD data collection form (version 2.5 or 3.0) 19 . This study was approved by the STS-CHSD Access and Publications Committee and the Duke University Institutional Review Board.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%