2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomenclature for Factors of the HLA System, Update January 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequencies found for the HLA class II alleles either by serological or molecular methods are shown in Table 3. From the HLA‐DRB1 alleles classified by the molecular approach, 21 HLA‐DRB1*01 was the most prevalent (11%, 10/88) and was significantly more prevalent in male patients than in female patients, (40%, 4/10 and 8%, 3/38, respectively) (OR = 7.78, 95% CI 1.38–43.85). With respect to the HLA class II alleles by serological classification, 20 male patients showed a more prevalent HLA DR1 group compared to female patients (50%, 4/8 and 15%, 6/40, respectively) (OR = 5.67, 95% CI 1.10–29.11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequencies found for the HLA class II alleles either by serological or molecular methods are shown in Table 3. From the HLA‐DRB1 alleles classified by the molecular approach, 21 HLA‐DRB1*01 was the most prevalent (11%, 10/88) and was significantly more prevalent in male patients than in female patients, (40%, 4/10 and 8%, 3/38, respectively) (OR = 7.78, 95% CI 1.38–43.85). With respect to the HLA class II alleles by serological classification, 20 male patients showed a more prevalent HLA DR1 group compared to female patients (50%, 4/8 and 15%, 6/40, respectively) (OR = 5.67, 95% CI 1.10–29.11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay was run according to the manufacturer's instructions. We also classified HLA class II alleles using the old serological classification 20 in order to test if there were any additional differences that were not likely to be detected by means of the molecular approach 21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%