“…For example, Twitter has been used to disseminate and discuss findings from society meetings, as strikingly demonstrated by the 2016 United States and Canadian Academy for Pathology (USCAP) meeting in Seattle, which generated over 19,000 tweets and over 28 million impressions [5,6]. Pathology discussions on social media also concern updates on diagnostic criteria, such as the recent changes in thyroid cancer classification [7,8]; World Health Organization (WHO) monographs [9]; regulatory frustrations; and research findings. There are numerous subspecialty interest groups, including a nephrology journal club with over 3,000 followers on Twitter [10] and a variety of pathology discussion groups on Facebook (e.g., dermatopathology and bone and soft tissue pathology, which had over 21,000 and 18,000 members, respectively, in April 2016 [11]).…”