1982
DOI: 10.2307/1220694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomina Nova Generica Et Combinations Novae Spermatophytorum Et Pteridophytorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generic position of this taxon has puzzled taxonomists for decades. It was first described as a member of Aphania and subsequently transferred in Sapindopsis, Howethoa, Sapindus (see Rauschert, 1982 for review) and recently merged, although informally, in Lepisanthes by Xia and Gadek (2007). The increase of sampling and the inclusion of Allophylus species might help to circumscribe the position of this taxon.…”
Section: The Cupania Group (Figs 4 and 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generic position of this taxon has puzzled taxonomists for decades. It was first described as a member of Aphania and subsequently transferred in Sapindopsis, Howethoa, Sapindus (see Rauschert, 1982 for review) and recently merged, although informally, in Lepisanthes by Xia and Gadek (2007). The increase of sampling and the inclusion of Allophylus species might help to circumscribe the position of this taxon.…”
Section: The Cupania Group (Figs 4 and 6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Marchand 1830). Soják (1979), Raizada & Bennet (1981) and Rauschert (1982) published new names and combinations for Courtoisia Nees, most of which proved superfluous. Wilson (1983) protested with good reason against the publication of superfluous names.…”
Section: Taxonomic Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first example of this species was collected by Tchichatscheff in Erzincan and published by Boissier with the name T. isatidea (Boissier, 1866). However, the genus name Tchihatchewia was previously used for a fossil vascular plant (Rauschert, 1982). According to the Article 7.9 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Greuter et al, 1999) the priority rule for naming vascular plants is also valid for fossil plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Article 7.9 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Greuter et al, 1999) the priority rule for naming vascular plants is also valid for fossil plants. Therefore, the name of the genus as it was published in Turkey was changed to Neotchihatchewia by Rauschert (1982). According to botanical rules, the name "N. isatidea (Boiss.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%