2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ieecon.2017.8075859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal ionospheric delay gradient estimation at Suvarnabhumi airport, Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 2013 to 2016, the averages of σ Vig are about 5 mm/km. In the related works, Budtho et al () measured the nominal ionospheric delay gradients during 2015 in the Thailand area and Saito, Yoshihara, et al () measured ionospheric delay gradients from 2011 in the Japan area, σ Vig values on quiet days showing they are about 5.27 and 4.9 mm/km respectively, which are comparable to the nighttime estimation in this work. The range of the σ Vig estimation is around 4.5 to 6.5 mm/km, except on the 62nd day in 2013, when there is only one day within the four‐year period with σ Vig of about 8.5 mm/km.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 2013 to 2016, the averages of σ Vig are about 5 mm/km. In the related works, Budtho et al () measured the nominal ionospheric delay gradients during 2015 in the Thailand area and Saito, Yoshihara, et al () measured ionospheric delay gradients from 2011 in the Japan area, σ Vig values on quiet days showing they are about 5.27 and 4.9 mm/km respectively, which are comparable to the nighttime estimation in this work. The range of the σ Vig estimation is around 4.5 to 6.5 mm/km, except on the 62nd day in 2013, when there is only one day within the four‐year period with σ Vig of about 8.5 mm/km.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the transformation matrix, when the integer ambiguity of the first satellite is questionable, this error will affect the others and causes such failure. For this reason, the first satellite elimination (Budtho et al, ) is applied whenever the faults occur. Then the LAMBDA method chooses the new candidates and processes all the remaining steps again.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], [14], the single-frequency station-pair delay gradient estimation was proposed based on the L1 frequency with the Kalman filter and the LAMBDA method. The satellite elimination [15] was also applied to this method to increase the success of the estimation. [18] Datta-Barua et al [19] Lee et al [16] Lee et al [20] Single-frequency receiver Fujita et al [13] Budtho et al [21] Khanafseh et al [22] -Mixed-pair method Lee et al [20] However, for most areas in Thailand, the GNSS receivers are widely separated (more than 20 km baselines) since they are not originally intended for delay gradient monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%