2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1062-9769(02)00145-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominal rates, real rates, and expected inflation: Results from a study of U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result on bond yield and inflation is consistent with many previous studies such as Fama and Schwert (1977), Engsted and Tanggaard (2002) and Laatsch and Klein (2003) who had examined government bonds in the US. The positive relationship shown between bond prices and inflation as noted in our study is explained by the expectation theory of term structure of interest rate.…”
Section: Government Bondsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result on bond yield and inflation is consistent with many previous studies such as Fama and Schwert (1977), Engsted and Tanggaard (2002) and Laatsch and Klein (2003) who had examined government bonds in the US. The positive relationship shown between bond prices and inflation as noted in our study is explained by the expectation theory of term structure of interest rate.…”
Section: Government Bondsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In another study, Engsted and Tanggaard (2002) observed that the relationship between US bond returns and inflation was positive; it became stronger as the horizon increased. From their study investigating the US government inflation-indexed bonds and inflation for the period of August 1997 to July 2001, Laatsch and Klein (2003) also noted that changes in nominal interest rates were significantly related to changes in expected inflation. However, a contrasting outcome was provided by Al-Khazali (1999) who found that yields on long-term government bond and inflation were not cointegrated in nine Pacific-Basin countries, over the period of 1980-1994.…”
Section: Fixed Income Securitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore,"standard" econometric models are no longer valid; rather, the co-integration approach should be employed. There are several examples of the use of this unit root/co-integration approach, beginning with the seminal studies of Rose (1988) [4] and Mishkin (1992) [5], whose methodology was subsequently applied in the more recent studies of Crowder and Wohar (1999) [6], Koustas and Serletis (1999) [7], Rapach (2002) [8], Laatsch and Klein (2003) [9] and Rapach and Weber (2005) [10], amongst many others. Some recent studies opted to use the panel data unit root/co-integration approach, as is the case of Westerlund (2008) [11] and Ozcan and Ari (2015) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its training dataset runs from January 1977 to December 1986 and testing dataset from February 1987 to May 1999. For our empirical experiments, input variable Z i = (z 1i , · · · , z mi ) is built on the basis of Fisher's theory that nominal interest rates are comprised of expected real interest rates and anticipated inflation [8,9,18,28]:…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%