2011
DOI: 10.1075/la.176.09sug
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nominalization affixes and multi-modularity of word formation

Abstract: This paper discusses the nature of restrictions imposed by derivational affixes on the bases in word formation. While some derivational affixes select the base of a particular syntactic category, there are affixes whose restrictions on the base are semantic in nature. Two sets of nominalization affixes in Japanese (-sa and -mi; -kata and -buri) display different and disjoint semantic and syntactic selectional properties, which operate independently from each other, as well as interact to block certain derived … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ur, as indicated in CL 13, has undergone a clipping system (Stockwell and Minkova 2001;Katamba and Stonham 2006;Sugioka 2011). Ur is a shortening form of your that the telecommunications industry sells to the Nigerian people.…”
Section: Etisalat Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ur, as indicated in CL 13, has undergone a clipping system (Stockwell and Minkova 2001;Katamba and Stonham 2006;Sugioka 2011). Ur is a shortening form of your that the telecommunications industry sells to the Nigerian people.…”
Section: Etisalat Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%