Nomination and Argumentation Strategies in Oratory Discourse: The Case of an English Sermon

Abstract

Inspired by critical discourse analysis and regarding language as a social medium whereby individuals, social groups, and institutions tend to express their beliefs and values, this study seeks to explore the persuasion and discourse strategies utilized in sermons. By focusing on the sermon of an influential native English orator and by employing Wodak's discourse-historical approach, it aims to investigate how the targeted religious genre unfolds to disclose the persuasive powers of the orator and its impact on the audience. The results obtained from the qualitative analysis of the corpus under investigation revealed that the speaker resorts to significant presentation of a wide range of topics to establish the oratory, and constructs the social actors through the application of nomination tools to qualify the selected actors through carefully formulated predication devices by laying out discursively logical justifications concerning various topos. Alternatively, the complementary quantitative corpus analysis using Corpus Presenter software also provided an insightful evidential basis reflecting orator's involvement, intensification of the intended illocutionary force, and his utilization of thought-provoking linguistic resources. Notably, the results presented here may shed light on the function of intertextuality in the genre of the sermon operationalized and activated through nomination strategies, the tools of argumentation theory, and interdiscursivity. Second, language learners' awareness of such elements may have an overriding importance in the process of text generation in speaking and writing processes.

A Course in Argumentation in Journalism in the Master’s Curriculum: Using Russian Popular Science Magazines as Case Studies

“…To confirm the hypothesis about the role of argumentation in diversifying the conceptual content of popular science discourse about tourism, argumentation discourse analysis methods were used. We drew upon the following studies to build the methodological basis of argumentation discourse analysis: (Candarli, 2018;Gigante, 2017;Kolbel, Jentges, 2017;Lawrence, Sherry, 2021;Mallow et al, 2020;Mansouri et al, 2017;Westby, 2018).…”

Critical Discourse Analysis: The Negative Representation of the French President in France's English Online News

“…The nomination strategy is used to analyse how the people and things are called in a discourse. In nomination strategy, proper name, synecdoche, metaphor, deictic and phobic expressions, collectives, and professional anthroponym can refer to social actors in a discourse (Kurniawan & Utami, 2017;Mansouri et al, 2017). Synecdoche is a type of metonymy that involves the usage of a word or phrase in which a portion of something reflects the entire thing (Yule, 2014).…”

Anatomizing Pope Francis’ pandemic homilies: Discourse parts and types in focus

“…Despite the extensive scholarship on religious discourse, there remains a notable gap in the analysis of Pope Francis' pandemic homilies in terms of discourse structure and text types. While numerous linguists have examined religious communication using diverse theoretical frameworks and textual corpora (see Adedun & Mekiliuwa, 2009;Capaldi, 2017;Ferrara, 2014;Guzik, 2018;Hopkins, 2010;Karanja, 2014;Mansouri et al, 2017;Szudrowicz-Gartska, 2012), studies have yet to be undertaken by systematically investigating organization of discourse parts and the identification of text types in the homilies delivered by a religious leader during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”