1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01533-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Abelian antibrackets

Abstract: The ∆-operator of the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism is the Hamiltonian BRST charge of Abelian shift transformations in the ghost momentum representation. We generalize this ∆-operator, and its associated hierarchy of antibrackets, to that of an arbitrary non-Abelian and possibly open algebra of any rank. We comment on the possible application of this formalism to closed string field theory.NBI-HE-95-39 hep-th/9511066 1

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be remarked that the weakly canonical form of the antibrackets is somewhat reminiscent of the 'non-Abelian' antibrackets of [13], however a significant difference is that the non-Abelian antibracket involves some functions u A i that depend on the φ A fields in such a way that the derivations u A In this way, we obtain a vector field on the triplectic manifold which ensures the Sp(2) covariance of the weakly canonical, but not reducible, antibrackets of the form (3.18) in which e i α has the form (A.1), (A.6). It can also be shown that there exist Sp(2)-covariant vector fields V a that differentiate the antibrackets defined by the above c i j .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be remarked that the weakly canonical form of the antibrackets is somewhat reminiscent of the 'non-Abelian' antibrackets of [13], however a significant difference is that the non-Abelian antibracket involves some functions u A i that depend on the φ A fields in such a way that the derivations u A In this way, we obtain a vector field on the triplectic manifold which ensures the Sp(2) covariance of the weakly canonical, but not reducible, antibrackets of the form (3.18) in which e i α has the form (A.1), (A.6). It can also be shown that there exist Sp(2)-covariant vector fields V a that differentiate the antibrackets defined by the above c i j .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have found a local coordinate system (x i , ξ 1j , ξ 2α ) in which (removing the tilde) 13) with all the other pairwise antibrackets of the coordinate functions vanishing. The symmetrized Jacobi identities for the antibrackets of the form (3.13) show that the functions λ ij depend only on ξ 1i , ξ 2α and satisfy the equations…”
Section: Finding Weak Canonical Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This works nicely for P = Lie, because we know what is a higher order coderivation of a cocommutative coalgebra. But we are not sure whether there exists a reasonable concept of higher-order coderivations without the cocommutativity, though the paper [4] seems to suggest this.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Conditions (3) and (4) also imply that the element := (−1) s s ⊗ s ∈ H ⊗2 rel is symmetric in the sense that (−1) s s ⊗ s = (−1) s s ⊗ s = −(−1) s s ⊗ s . (6) We use, in the previous formula as well as at many places in the rest of the paper, the Einstein convention of summing over repeated indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first analysis of this more general framework was carried out in ref. [6], and it has more recently been considered from a different point of view [7,8]. The relevant mathematical structure can be described by a tower of higher antibrackets [9], and their associated algebra [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%