2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24486-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-adaptive Learning of a Hidden Hypergraph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then use the reduction of Abasi et. al in [15] to give a non-adaptive algorithm that runs in poly(d d , n) time and asks O(d 3 2 d log n) queries. This is result (9) in the table.…”
Section: Results For Non-adaptive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then use the reduction of Abasi et. al in [15] to give a non-adaptive algorithm that runs in poly(d d , n) time and asks O(d 3 2 d log n) queries. This is result (9) in the table.…”
Section: Results For Non-adaptive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second algorithm we apply the reduction described in [15] to the above algorithm. We first give the reduction.…”
Section: Theorem 2 There Is a Deterministic Non-adaptive Algorithm Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We significantly reduce the upper bound on the number of tests for constructing disjunct matrices compared with the work of Chen et al [3]. This improvement paves the way to improve results not only in group testing, but also in other fields such as graph learning [23] and cover-free families [24].…”
Section: A Contributionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Without considering the decoding procedure, Chen et al [4] showed that the number of non-adaptive tests is O z p r r p s s p ln n p , where p = s + r and ⌊ z−1 2 ⌋ is the maximum number of erroneous outcomes. Abasi [25] considered a fraction of the errors in test outcomes under the conditions r < s and r ≤ O ln 2 p ln ln p . Abasi showed that all positive complexes can be identified in time poly(t)×O(n ln n), where t = O(r 11 (4s) r+7 ln n).…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [4] and Chin et al [5] gave two upper bounds on the number of tests. Without considering erroneous outcomes, Abasi et al [24] reported the first algorithm requiring O(t 1+o (1) ln n) tests to identify positive complexes in time poly(t) • O(n ln n), where t is the number of rows in an (s+r, r; 1]-disjunct matrix. By considering erroneous outcomes, Abasi [25] needed t = poly(s r , ln n) tests to identify all positive complexes in time poly(t)•O(n ln n).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%