2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-adherence and discontinuation rate for oral and parenteral methotrexate: A retrospective-cohort study in 8,952 patients with psoriatic arthritis

Abstract: Background and aims Treatment options for PsA, following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), include conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDS), particularly methotrexate (MTX). The present study was performed to determine the non-adherence and discontinuation rates of different methotrexate (MTX) formulations in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Approach and results We performed a retrospective-cohort study on patients with PsA identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Route of administration is another obstacle to adherence. Oral MTX formulation is associated with two times increased risk of non-adherence compared to the parenteral route [ 22 ]. In a study conducted, the non-adherence to MTX treatment was observed in 38% of patients (n=1108) with oral MTX with a high risk of non-adherence (Hazard ratio-HR 2.11, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.87-2.39, p < 0.001) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Route of administration is another obstacle to adherence. Oral MTX formulation is associated with two times increased risk of non-adherence compared to the parenteral route [ 22 ]. In a study conducted, the non-adherence to MTX treatment was observed in 38% of patients (n=1108) with oral MTX with a high risk of non-adherence (Hazard ratio-HR 2.11, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.87-2.39, p < 0.001) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral MTX formulation is associated with two times increased risk of non-adherence compared to the parenteral route [ 22 ]. In a study conducted, the non-adherence to MTX treatment was observed in 38% of patients (n=1108) with oral MTX with a high risk of non-adherence (Hazard ratio-HR 2.11, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.87-2.39, p < 0.001) [ 22 ]. For parenteral route of administration of MTX with doses of 7.5,10, and 15 mg weekly doses, there had been lower risk of non-adherence (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.038; HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.71, p < 0.001; HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.58-0.85, p < 0.001, respectively) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 15 The non-adherence rate for MTX in Italian patients with psoriatic arthritis was 38% (1108 of 2952 patients) with a twofold increase in non-adherence for oral versus parenteral MTX. 16 In part, this may be due to more gastrointestinal events with oral versus subcutaneous MTX. 2 Concerns about side effects may result in an active avoidance of taking the medication, also named as conscious non-adherence, whereas unconscious, non-intentional poor adherence can be caused by insufficient patient motivation, drug regimen misunderstanding, forgetfulness, needle phobia, and problems with drug administration due to reduced hand capabilities or complex handling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%