2018 Joint Propulsion Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Adiabatic Flamelet Modeling for the Numerical Simulation of Methane Combustion in Rocket Thrust Chambers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was possible to further investigate injector-injector interactions by means of a second chamber, consisting of seven coaxial injectors [21]. The literature shows that a wide variety of combustion models coupled with RANS [22][23][24][25][26][27] and LES [28] could deliver reasonable results in terms of wall heat flux prediction. Nevertheless the overall trend shows that the quality of the prediction of wall heat flux and axial pressure distribution depends on the interaction between three models: the (subgrid) turbulence model [15], the chemical reaction mechanism, and the turbulence-chemistry interaction model [12,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was possible to further investigate injector-injector interactions by means of a second chamber, consisting of seven coaxial injectors [21]. The literature shows that a wide variety of combustion models coupled with RANS [22][23][24][25][26][27] and LES [28] could deliver reasonable results in terms of wall heat flux prediction. Nevertheless the overall trend shows that the quality of the prediction of wall heat flux and axial pressure distribution depends on the interaction between three models: the (subgrid) turbulence model [15], the chemical reaction mechanism, and the turbulence-chemistry interaction model [12,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%